Does it make sense to regulate interconnection fees?

Joosep Pintsaar

05 Sep 2017 -

5 min read

Joosep Pintsaar

05 Sep 2017

-

2 min read

We’ve seen all kinds of countries and market situations at Messente –from Europe to Latin America, to Southeast Asia. The telecommunications industry landscape is unique in every market, but there are patterns.

One of those patterns that has a lot of influence in forming local telco landscapes is the presence and the role of regulatory government institutions.

There is one in most every developed market, but the extent of its role and functions is what matters what matters. One of the main differences in the set of functions is whether the regulatory institution influences (or even dictates) interconnection prices between network operators or not.  

From a philosophical standpoint, having a public-sector institution enforcing interconnection prices is a matter of market ideology. On one end of the spectrum, the telecommunications industry in any country may be a place where the free market sets prices, or completely controlled by the state on the other end.

The question of, “what is generally the optimal position on this spectrum,” I will leave to the able hands of economists.

But what I would touch upon, however, is whether there is a need for fixing interconnection fees by a state authority in 2017.

In my opinion –no, there is not.

Simply put, fixed or enforced interconnection fees ensure that one carrier (and its user base) does not get cut away from other networks operated in a country by unreasonably high cross network fees. It’s a situation quite hard to even imagine from the viewpoint of a European surrounded by rather mature telecom landscapes.

In an advanced society, and even reasonably competitive markets, blocking another network operator with high interconnection fees is an unlikely situation to happen. And this is realized by many countries –for example, in Poland, where the interconnection fees were recently deregulated.

In an era of flat monthly fees and service bundles, countless 3rd party communication platforms, and the rise of text-based communication, “borderless” has become the standard.

Think about number portability and other transformations we have seen.

The telecommunications industry has become a competition won by opening doors, instead of putting up walls.

What's SMS service quality?


Joosep Pintsaar

Head of carrier relations

Joosep is the person taking care that your messages will be delivered no matter where and when.




We're here to help you connect with your customers. Let's start talking.

Email again:

Further reading

A note on keeping things real

17 Apr 2018

Over the years, I've had the good fortune of talking to and doing business with many entrepreneurs and...

Lauri Kinkar

2 min read

Next-generation Omnichannel API is well underway

10 Apr 2018

Over the last few months we’ve been setting the direction of our Omnichannel messaging API and our development...

Uku Loskit

2 min read

You're protected from the pitfalls of grey routes

03 Apr 2018

“Grey routes” is a loosely used term in the telecommunications industry. Frankly, the industry-specific meaning of grey routes...

Joosep Pintsaar

2 min read

Announcing preliminary plans for the Dashboard!

27 Mar 2018

Our development team is always hunkered down, working on our APIs to create better communication and verification products...

Jaanus Rõõmus

2 min read